Lenovo 81LL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81LL  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '23 at 13:41
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300HF
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 127
51% 83.7 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 328
26% 232 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Legend(17AA 3A40) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 37
Parallax 37
28% 36 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 25.1
24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDHTNG-8310A 256GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80060C00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 793
Write 283
Mixed 370
105% 482 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 30.5
106% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 436
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 310
236% 324 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 148%
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
819GB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 356 363 384 376 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 387
Write 371
Mixed 324
SusWrite 361
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 28.7
95% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 221
190% 281 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
34.5% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 10.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 51 60 17.2" 1920 1080 AUO179D
Typical 81LL Builds (Compare 1,413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 81LL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback