Gigabyte B460M AORUS PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago, 3 months ago.

System	Gigabyte B460MAORUSPRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte B460M AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200828
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '23 at 11:18
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	59%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 83 1-Core 110 2-Core 212 77% 135 Pts	4-Core 407 8-Core 663 66% 535 Pts	64-Core 924 57% 924 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Asus(1043 8673) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 109 Parallax 125 102% 120 fps	MRender 170 Gravity 123 Splatting 104 105% 132 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170 138,083 User benchmarks, average bench 416% 491GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1700 1630 1552 1321 1107 1084 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 1,305 Write 1,682 Mixed 926 SusWrite 1,399 300% 1,328 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 94.3 4K Mixed 38.6 136% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 878 DQ Write 675 DQ Mixed 780 583% 778 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 526%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ADF2G72AZ-2G6E1 4x16GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 35.5 MC Mixed 27.5 89% 31 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 30.6 SC Mixed 20 62% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	240	24.5"	1920 1080	BNQ7F83 ZOWIE XL LCD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B460M AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 127%

UFO

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 115%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte B460M AORUS PRO - $95

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	590x
Core i5-10400Intel $99Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	322x
Core i7-10700Intel $233Bench 93%, 71,010 samples	155x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	185x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	152x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	141x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	49x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	43x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	112x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	80x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $711

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16