Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 67.3 1-Core 67.6 2-Core 135 53% 90 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 518 46% 391 Pts	64-Core 1,310 81% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000 12,628 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.1% Above average	Lighting 77 Reflection 88.7 Parallax 82.1 63% 82.6 fps	MRender 85.4 Gravity 83.4 Splatting 0.2 40% 56.3 fps
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 70%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 476 Write 444 Mixed 380 97% 433 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 42.2 4K Mixed 32.3 106% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 286 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 250 189% 254 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 1D05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 110 Write 112 Mixed 77.3 74% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 85%
Seagate One Touch Hub 8TB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 6.5TB free Firmware: 0066 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 133 Write 95.7 Mixed 45.5 67% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.9 403% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 91%
Seagate Desktop 8TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 293GB free Firmware: 040B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 88.4 Write 101 Mixed 26.5 52% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.6 379% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 93%
Seagate Desktop 8TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 974GB free Firmware: 040B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 80.3 Write 92 Mixed 73.8 62% 82 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.5 234% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 16x4GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 16 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	MC Read 63.6 MC Write 45.4 MC Mixed 49.5 151% 52.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 4.9 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 127%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	21.5"	1920 1080	DELA096 DELL S2240T

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	146x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16