Gigabyte GA-H67M-UD2H-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H67M-UD2H-B3  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 21:52
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Memory 13.6
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 122
38% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 434
42% 345 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.7
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 283 166 138 130 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.2% Above average
Read 209
Write 225
Mixed 221
SusWrite 190
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 29.4
99% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 34.8
DQ Write 72
DQ Mixed 46
37% 50.9 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 134%
WD WD20EVDS-63T3B0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 93 92 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 81.9
Write 91.9
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 92.8
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3750330NS 750GB
134GB free
Firmware: NA01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 67 67 66 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 63.6
Write 58.8
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 66.4
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
24.8% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 372
11% 372 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 22" 1280 720 SAM0835 SMS22A450
Typical GA-H67M-UD2H-B3 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H67M-UD2H-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $344
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback