Lenovo 82TF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82TF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 21:29
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 160
2-Core 318
95% 182 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 665
70% 562 Pts
64-Core 914
57% 914 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 380C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3889
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 22.6
14% 39.2 fps
MRender 21.8
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 18
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$145
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620311WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 633 1243 1178 1697 1771 1683 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,661
Write 2,115
Mixed 2,037
SusWrite 1,368
458% 2,045 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 69.9
235% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 629
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 515
378% 501 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 285%
Great: 685%
Micron MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
475GB free
Firmware: 1006P7LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1107 1528 1311 1223 569 684 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 2,827
Write 1,702
Mixed 1,271
SusWrite 1,070
381% 1,717 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 64.7
211% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 624
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 284
256% 398 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 265%
Great: 430%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 16GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 54.2
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 46.6
139% 48.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 24.9
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 126%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 14 165 16" 1280 720 CSO1613
Typical 82TF Builds (Compare 604 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82TF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback