Asus PRIME Z490-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z490-A  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 21:25
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$249
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 151
2-Core 299
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,134
103% 864 Pts
64-Core 1,951
121% 1,951 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 87C6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 181
Parallax 169
152% 179 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 141
Splatting 111
117% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 1TB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 143 201 181 212 147 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.5% Good
Read 234
Write 105
Mixed 141
SusWrite 185
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 33.1
119% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 8.4
62% 140 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 103%
Pcie SSD 1TB
114GB free
Firmware: EIFM21.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1053 1419 1274 1144 1351 822 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 951
Write 1102
Mixed 646
SusWrite 1,177
219% 969 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 77.7
245% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,258
DQ Write 1,056
DQ Mixed 1,138
858% 1,151 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 238%
Great: 438%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$78
313GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 136 137 135 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 121
Write 122
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 136
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 86%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
54GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 48 25 25 24 23 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 155
Write 52.9
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 34.9
91% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.5
135% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 39%
External RAID 1TB
129GB free, PID 0077
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 54.2
Write 36.3
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 42.7
54% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 24.4
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 26
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical PRIME Z490-A Builds (Compare 7,409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z490-A - $225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,097
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback