Gigabyte GA-Z97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 20 '17 at 14:33
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 391
50% 379 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 138
Parallax 122
108% 131 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 127
Splatting 104
92% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
29GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 479
Write 268
Mixed 272
75% 340 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 28.2
122% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 39.2
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 64.8
61% 91.2 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77%
Great: 123%
Corsair Force GS 128GB-$150
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.05A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 405
Write 224
Mixed 159
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 9.35
85% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 30.9
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 8.17
31% 65.4 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 86%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1TB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 120
Write 159
Mixed 144
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 5.45
4K Mixed 0.59
193% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
622GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 135
Write 118
Mixed 117
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.49
123% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
581GB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 81.6
Write 132
Mixed 104
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 5.36
4K Mixed 0.42
174% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CML4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback