MSI Z390 PLUS (MS-7C22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 273%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 270%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics294% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C22
MotherboardMSI Z390 PLUS (MS-7C22)  (all builds)
Memory43.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 05:43
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$269
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 87.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 255
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 979
94% 773 Pts
64-Core 1,431
89% 1,431 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$958
PNY(196E 13BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Lighting 430
Reflection 448
Parallax 492
351% 457 fps
MRender 582
Gravity 391
Splatting 280
326% 418 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 294%
Great: 305%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 205 205 208 209 212 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 461
Mixed 388
SusWrite 212
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 35.8
138% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 256
214% 313 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 86D3 SP008GXLZU320BSB 86D3 86D3 SP008GXLZU320BSB 48GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 27.5
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 27
78% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 87%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1920 1080 SAM0D34 C32F391
Typical Z390 PLUS (MS-7C22) Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390 PLUS (MS-7C22)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $673
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback