Gigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive482% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4  (all builds)
Memory19.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 02:00
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700-$292
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 77.4
1-Core 210
2-Core 421
121% 236 Pts
4-Core 850
8-Core 1,627
147% 1,238 Pts
64-Core 2,934
182% 2,934 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 118%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4577
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
8.92% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 158
Parallax 11.4
8% 59.8 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 13.3
Splatting 11.4
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.92%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
687GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4762 3525 3048 1943 1700 926 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
482% Outstanding
Read 2,832
Write 4,504
Mixed 3,132
SusWrite 2,651
743% 3,280 MB/s
4K Read 81.8
4K Write 311
4K Mixed 129
454% 174 MB/s
DQ Read 1,682
DQ Write 1,328
DQ Mixed 1,548
1,147% 1,520 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 482%
Great: 591%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
629GB free
Firmware: M6CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 221 226 223 234 225 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 99%
Akitio SK-2520 U3.1 500GB
69GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 416 416 416 413 411 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.2% Very good
Read 364
Write 374
Mixed 340
SusWrite 415
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 29.1
92% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 182
133% 172 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 80%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 167 166 165 167 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 157
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 166
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 100%
ST2000VN 004-2E4164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 128 128 128 127 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.5% Above average
Read 121
Write 124
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 128
147% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 24.8
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 21.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 BNQ78CD BenQ GW2255
Typical GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4 Builds (Compare 4,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $541
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback