Acer Aspire A514-52K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A514-52K  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sneezy_KL
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200331
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 23 '23 at 23:57
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Memory 10.2
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 83.3
24% 46.9 Pts
4-Core 87.6
8-Core 126
13% 107 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 137B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7463
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 5.5
4% 4.93 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 8.6
6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1001 512GB
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 551 371 610 708 653 751 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
78% Very good
Read 592
Write 532
Mixed 546
SusWrite 607
128% 569 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 14.2
45% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 81.4
DQ Write 62.4
DQ Mixed 67.3
52% 70.4 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 78%
Great: 278%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
711GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 98 119 121 121 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 140
Write 141
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 117
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
199% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D22.2318BH.001 Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
22% Poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.8
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 3.7
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 402
10% 402 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 14" 1296 759 BOE081D
Typical Aspire A514-52K Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A514-52K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback