Asus X556UAM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemAsus X556UAM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X556UAM
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '23 at 21:16
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 112
53% 84.2 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 161
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 11C0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.47% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 5.9
4% 5.33 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 8.9
5% 5.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 14 43 12 47 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.9% Below average
Read 188
Write 85.8
Mixed 146
SusWrite 45.2
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 17.1
63% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 91.6
83% 126 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 859B CT4G4SFS8213.C8FBD2 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.1% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 21 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO38ED
Typical X556UAM Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X556UAM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback