MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 324%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 407%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics329% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive564% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D50
MotherboardMSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)  (all builds)
Memory57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '23 at 15:05
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.55 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 89.4
1-Core 167
2-Core 285
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 615
8-Core 1,179
107% 897 Pts
64-Core 3,106
192% 3,106 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3330 MHz, MLim: 5650 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
329% Outstanding
Lighting 486
Reflection 571
Parallax 829
396% 629 fps
MRender 513
Gravity 585
Splatting 305
367% 468 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 329%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 60 65 65 67 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
564% Outstanding
Read 7,274
Write 57.6
Mixed 115
SusWrite 61.2
390% 1,877 MB/s
4K Read 665
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 7.3
1,019% 225 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 564%
Great: 521%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
837GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2252 2831 3041 2971 1897 1736 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
399% Outstanding
Read 2,400
Write 2981
Mixed 2,508
SusWrite 2,455
585% 2,586 MB/s
4K Read 65.4
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 93.7
308% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,345
DQ Write 1227
DQ Mixed 1,273
958% 1,282 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 399%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 55.4
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 41.5
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 40
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 124%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50) Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,664
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback