Medion MD35044

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MD35044  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B460H6-EM
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '23 at 10:37
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 81.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 229
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 695
70% 570 Pts
64-Core 904
56% 904 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 8752) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.2% Very good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 87.9
Parallax 82.9
75% 87.8 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 79.2
Splatting 71.4
69% 86.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12-512G-PHISON-SSD-B27-BB1 512GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,185
Write 1,939
Mixed 1,278
331% 1,467 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 61.6
193% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 759
DQ Write 635
DQ Mixed 707
527% 700 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 219%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
324GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 116 111 113 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 182
Write 158
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 114
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.3% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 13.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1920 1080 AUS2782 VG279
Typical MD35044 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Medion MD35044

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback