Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

9 months ago, 9 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400 26,927 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Memory 64.3 1-Core 74.8 2-Core 147 55% 95.3 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 372 38% 306 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? MSI(1462 1114) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	3.02% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 5.5 3% 8.47 fps	MRender 6.4 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.4 4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.02% Great: 3%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 480GB-$180 3,042 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: RG21 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 387 Write 214 Mixed 274 64% 292 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 18.4 4K Mixed 19.9 70% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 97.3 DQ Mixed 116 96% 142 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 69%
Sandisk U100 16GB 448 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 14GB free Firmware: 10.56.01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 236 Write 59.1 Mixed 58.9 25% 118 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 8.7 38% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 25.8 DQ Write 7.9 DQ Mixed 9.2 9% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G3S160BM.C16FPR 2x8GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	37% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 11.6 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 8.8 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	2	210	59	60	15.6"	1536 864	LGD0259

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16