Asrock A520M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 21:59
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 162
2-Core 318
100% 187 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 918
94% 762 Pts
64-Core 1,087
67% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$300
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 111
Reflection 130
Parallax 226
90% 156 fps
MRender 221
Gravity 118
Splatting 181
142% 173 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AK-SATA-480G 480GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 316 93 106 41 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 467
Write 400
Mixed 369
SusWrite 163
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 25.4
143% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 35.7
87% 176 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.5% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 17.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 21.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 53 60 14.9" 1280 720 KOA0030 KONKA LCDTV
Typical A520M-HDV Builds (Compare 717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback