Pegatron A15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPegatron A15  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON A15
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120704
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 18:43
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 74
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 53.5
40% 56 Pts
4-Core 55.5
8-Core 55.4
8% 55.5 Pts
64-Core 55.8
4% 55.8 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Device(1B0A 2080) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.71% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 2.3
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.71%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 131 35 81 54 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 417
Write 272
Mixed 342
SusWrite 106
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 8.9
64% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 55.3
DQ Mixed 26.3
34% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MK3276GSX 320GB-$12
55GB free
Firmware: GS001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 62 61 58 57 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 72.3
Write 67.2
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 58.3
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CK0 02FE EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
23.4% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 6.9
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 4.2
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 14% 7 26 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD02DC
Typical A15 Builds (Compare 385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron A15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback