Lenovo 30BBS19H01

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 30BBS19H01  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1037
Memory177.2 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230621
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 14:29
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6148
CPU0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 216
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 827
74% 622 Pts
64-Core 3,967
246% 3,967 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M6000
HP(103C 1129) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.96
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.4% Good
Lighting 81.2
Reflection 98.2
Parallax 86.9
66% 88.8 fps
MRender 82.1
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 74.7
64% 78.5 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 77%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
728GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,646
Write 1,956
Mixed 1,781
403% 1,794 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 52.5
170% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 423
DQ Mixed 552
409% 546 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 394%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CTD 12x16GB
12 of 12 slots used
192GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
130% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 74.2
MC Mixed 50.4
156% 54.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 130%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27.2" 2560 1440 GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback