Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 5130 237 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Memory 62.9 1-Core 22.3 2-Core 43.3 31% 42.8 Pts	4-Core 71.5 8-Core 89.7 10% 80.6 Pts	64-Core 89.7 6% 89.7 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 41%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050V 500GB 5,167 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 444GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX0U1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 83 83 82 84 83 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 76.7 Write 74.5 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 78.5 49% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x1GB 2,345 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 6 of 8 slots used 6GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 4.2 12% 4.03 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	0	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon 51501stBench 40%, 627 samples	21x
CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples	12x
CPU: Intel Xeon X53551stBench 42%, 426 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce 7300 GTNvidiaBench 0%, 1,554 samples	8x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	7x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	3x

SSD
Blue SA510 2.5 500GBWDBench 85%, 3,744 samples	4x
WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GBWDCBench 87%, 12,305 samples	4x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16