Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP1400KA TP1400KA_TP1400KA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP1400KA TP1400KA_TP1400KA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP1400KA
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220726
Uptime13.5 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 10:40
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
33.3% Below average
Memory 32.2
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 117
42% 75.5 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 204
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1D22) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 5.6
4% 4.53 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 6.6
5% 5.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0SA6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 239 316 354 243 200 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 774
Write 819
Mixed 790
SusWrite 305
151% 672 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 34.7
112% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 395
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 356
261% 344 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 193%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.4% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 4
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 242
16% 242 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 51 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14D4
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP1400KA TP1400KA_TP1400KA Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP1400KA TP1400KA_TP1400KA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback