Asus X540UPR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemAsus X540UPR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X540UPR
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 09:10
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 182
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 324
37% 290 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1CE0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.35% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 5.9
4% 5.27 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 6.6
5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.35%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 417 424 437 453 436 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 399
Mixed 361
SusWrite 432
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 41.2
133% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 288
233% 330 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 859B CB16GS2666.C8FT 24GB
2133, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.7% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 19.6
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 20.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM0D1A S22F350
Typical X540UPR Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X540UPR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback