Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 00:30
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 72
1-Core 110
2-Core 222
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 623
58% 484 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
ASRock(1849 5120) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 124
Parallax 177
91% 138 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 119
Splatting 80
78% 97.5 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 201 184 177 159 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,604
Write 1,060
Mixed 862
SusWrite 214
207% 935 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 52.8
180% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 613
445% 587 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 159%
Great: 220%
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
119GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 214 213 219 222 221 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 473
Mixed 356
SusWrite 241
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 44.5
152% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 262
221% 321 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
892GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 146 128 118 131 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 135
Write 119
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 129
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 9905702-119.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 27.8
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 19 531 424 60 21.5" 1920 1080 SAM0B3F S22D300
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,704 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $418
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback