Dell OptiPlex 3020

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 3020
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3020  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 22:48
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 335
43% 324 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
HP(103C 3421) 2GB
CLim: 1260 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.Q3
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 34.8
20% 28.3 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 28.2
Splatting 20
20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
652GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 120 124 127 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 128
Write 120
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 122
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 859B CT51264BA160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 0P 1R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 50% 18 517 438 60 20" 1680 1050 HWP2695 HP L2045w
Typical OptiPlex 3020 Builds (Compare 6,557 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3020

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback