| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Huananzhi X79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180906 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 21 '23 at 18:46 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
67.2%
Good
|
60% 100 Pts
|
45% 364 Pts
|
32% 515 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
MSI(1462 2383) 1GB
CLim: 870 MHz, MLim: 1020 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
16% 20.9 fps
|
16% 20.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
270% 1,220 MB/s
|
146% 46.4 MB/s
|
244% 324 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
65GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 136 142 133 142 160 MB/s
|
88.8%
Excellent
|
90% 125 MB/s
|
137% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170GB0- 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
82.4%
Excellent
|
93% 32.5 GB/s
|
33% 11.5 GB/s
|
50% 79.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 13: 0P 1R 1G 5B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13% | 9% | 78 | 217 | 60 | 70 | 0" | 1280 720 | Default |
Typical X79 Builds (Compare 672 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Huananzhi X79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 124x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 71x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 67x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 44x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 42x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 39x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $158 |