Casper EXCALIBUR G770

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G770  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER NLAJ 001
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220325
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 13:14
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 52.6
1-Core 139
2-Core 276
80% 156 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 674
72% 576 Pts
64-Core 770
48% 770 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Quanta(152D 1362) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3699
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.5% Good
Lighting 86.7
Reflection 81.8
Parallax 78
71% 82.2 fps
MRender 76.6
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 63.1
55% 68.5 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SSD 500GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA15.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 205
Write 1,327
Mixed 256
137% 596 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 40.8
150% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 962
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 881
598% 744 MB/s
Poor: 110% Great: 240%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
87GB free
Firmware: UF4304RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 139 141 140 139 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 422
Write 340
Mixed 158
SusWrite 161
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 7.6
46% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 92.4
DQ Mixed 35.8
46% 81.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M8FF CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FR 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
64.1% Good
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 21.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 9.6
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 15.5" 1920 1080 BOE0910
Typical EXCALIBUR G770 Builds (Compare 3,292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback