Lenovo 239238G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 239238G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 239238G
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 12:38
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 31.4
2-Core 62.1
33% 49.8 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 140
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F6) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.67 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM871 2.5 7mm 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMM02D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 413 425 402 406 415 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 453
Write 432
Mixed 340
SusWrite 414
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 27.7
91% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 176
129% 171 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/8G 859B M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.5% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 21 60 26" 1280 720 XXX0000 TV
Typical 239238G Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 239238G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback