MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230630
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 05:40
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 168
2-Core 226
95% 162 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 861
81% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,110
69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSI(1462 5059) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4850 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
138% Outstanding
Lighting 191
Reflection 236
Parallax 173
155% 200 fps
MRender 234
Gravity 144
Splatting 122
131% 167 fps
Poor: 121%
This bench: 138%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 989 826 827 831 834 836 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,680
Write 2,625
Mixed 1,915
SusWrite 857
452% 2,019 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 98.4
332% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,381
DQ Write 1,264
DQ Mixed 1,292
978% 1,312 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 321%
Great: 346%
Amd-raid Array 4 2TB
667GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 54 56 53 54 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 114
Write 120
Mixed 95.9
SusWrite 52.1
71% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
207% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 108%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
816GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 57 58 58 56 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 325
Write 326
Mixed 167
SusWrite 54.4
161% 218 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 1.2
455% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 110%
Great: 201%
Amd-raid Array 3 3TB
866GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 48 47 48 47 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42% Average
Read 100
Write 93.1
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 45.3
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.8
181% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 42%
Great: 101%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
2TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 102 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 126
Write 111
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 99.9
139% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.8
263% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 36.7
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.8
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 38.1
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5BC9 LG FHD
Typical B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 8,951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback