HP xw6600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP xw6600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A9Ch
Memory15 GB free of 20.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '23 at 17:33
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5420-$79
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
29.4% Poor
Memory 42.9
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 38.6
24% 35.4 Pts
4-Core 91.9
8-Core 99.7
13% 95.8 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gainward(10B0 1401) 2GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.1% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 44.4
Parallax 40.1
34% 42.3 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 34.8
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 141 89 27 88 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.2% Poor
Read 216
Write 200
Mixed 207
SusWrite 72.4
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 18.7
50% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
390GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 86 80 86 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 56.6
Write 47.2
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 84.4
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 69%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
81GB free
Firmware: CP10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 53 53 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 49.3
Write 61.2
Mixed 37
SusWrite 53.8
37% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 53GB
null MHz
1024, 4096, 1024, 4096, 1024, 4096, 1024, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 1.9
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 60 20.1" 1680 1050 BNQ7707 BenQ FP222Wa
Typical xw6600 Workstation Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw6600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback