ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Graphics	56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO (all builds)
Memory	29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140716
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '14 at 07:55
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 118 2-Core 235 80% 176 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 670 66% 542 Pts	64-Core 672 42% 672 Pts
Poor: 67% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Sapphire(174B E285) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.200.1004.0 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Lighting 70.6 Reflection 62.3 Parallax 82.2 58% 71.7 fps	MRender 57.5 Gravity 63.5 Splatting 78.3 56% 66.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 480GB-$195 707 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 360GB free Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 82 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 336 (AB) Unknown 100 100 157927760 (AE) Unknown 100 100 112 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 20 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E9) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4348 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3071 (F9) Unknown 100 100 143737610	118% Outstanding	Read 523 Write 502 Mixed 499 114% 508 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 165 4K Mixed 36.5 182% 77.5 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 30.1 90% 192 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 108%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120 11,799 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 72 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 343 (AB) Unknown 100 100 79821648 (AE) Unknown 100 100 13 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 122 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E9) Unknown 96 96 96 (F1) Unknown 100 100 9815 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3367 (F9) Unknown 100 100 759774728	102% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 413 Mixed 439 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 30.3 158% 66.6 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 37.2 89% 181 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 101%
Corsair Flash Voyager GTX USB 3.0 256GB-$142 71 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 193GB free, PID 1a0e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	274% Outstanding	Read 344 Write 146 Mixed 133 225% 207 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 60.3 4K Mixed 9.69 2,489% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 31.9 DQ Write 64.3 DQ Mixed 10.2 2,652% 35.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 274% Great: 195%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 3,791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	2,717x
Core i5-4690KIntel $50Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	316x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	251x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	529x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	258x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	246x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	198x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	174x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	127x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	185x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	158x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	102x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $642

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback