Asus ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K6502VJ
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '23 at 05:19
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 72.4
1-Core 182
2-Core 369
107% 208 Pts
4-Core 740
8-Core 1225
120% 982 Pts
64-Core 1,854
115% 1,854 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 105%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 3158) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.3% Good
Lighting 82.3
Reflection 73.2
Parallax 80.3
67% 78.6 fps
MRender 50.1
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 58.1
47% 57.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TB
836GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1709 1343 1941 2061 1195 1405 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,180
Write 1,717
Mixed 1192
SusWrite 1,609
323% 1,425 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 61.6
210% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,050
DQ Write 416
DQ Mixed 755
553% 740 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 243%
Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 16GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 61.2
MC Write 52.7
MC Mixed 51
157% 55 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 27.7
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 107%
This bench: 142%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 27 203 31 120 15.5" 1440 810 SDC4180
Typical ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Asus ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback