HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8478
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221110
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateAug 19 '23 at 05:02
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 128
61% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 330
37% 289 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8478) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3699
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Lighting 30.6
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 30.5
25% 30.2 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 31.7
Splatting 19.4
22% 28.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
791GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 734
Write 629
Mixed 863
166% 742 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 21.4
68% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 609
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 289
284% 456 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 300%
Hs-ssd-e100 1024G 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: HS14752
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 386
Write 352
Mixed 288
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 29.4
97% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 271
201% 266 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15S4/8G KF2666C15S4/8G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.4% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 0P 1R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 10% 80 465 371 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE07A1
Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx Builds (Compare 4,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback