Acer Aspire A515-55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardIL Doc_IL
Memory14.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime19.2 Days
Run DateAug 19 '23 at 03:07
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 96.8
42% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 207
23% 181 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 28% Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Acer(1025 1429) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 1.3
4% 3.3 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AA 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 518 488 407 691 726 709 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 408
Write 694
Mixed 527
SusWrite 590
126% 555 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 13.8
47% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 98
DQ Mixed 128
96% 130 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 20GB
3200, 2667 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
23% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 7.5
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 4.4
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 599
7% 599 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 23%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 4% 25 24 6 60 15.5" 1536 864 AUO61ED
Typical Aspire A515-55 Builds (Compare 851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback