Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	16.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190911
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '23 at 01:52
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 76.3 1-Core 137 2-Core 263 86% 159 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 799 79% 644 Pts	64-Core 978 61% 978 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 92%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 562GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1051 1037 1034 936 1027 1033 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	247% Outstanding	Read 1,278 Write 1,075 Mixed 1,069 SusWrite 1,019 250% 1,110 MB/s	4K Read 63.8 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 72.8 266% 93.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,237 DQ Write 1,102 DQ Mixed 1,158 872% 1,166 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 247% Great: 410%
Dataram S420 240GB SSD 38 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 128GB free Firmware: R102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 152 108 109 108 109 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 449 Write 175 Mixed 314 SusWrite 165 61% 276 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 75.7 4K Mixed 25.1 122% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 34.6 67% 131 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 242GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 103 103 106 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 124 Write 121 Mixed 79.1 SusWrite 103 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 190GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 102 101 102 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 148 Write 153 Mixed 96.7 SusWrite 102 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 250% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ DDR4 3000 2OZ DDR4 2400 2OZ DDR4 3000 2OZ 24GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 30.5 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 28.4 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 87.8 46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 29: 0P 4R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
29%	22%	41	200	22	100	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	401x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	134x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	88x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	52x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $571

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16