Asus M4N68T-M

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4N68T-M (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110705
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '17 at 16:55
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 635 5,306 User benchmarks, average bench 45% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Memory 64.9 1-Core 34 2-Core 74.5 38% 57.8 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 140 18% 137 Pts	64-Core 136 8% 136 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85D7) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.3% Poor	Lighting 32 Reflection 24.4 Parallax 30.4 26% 28.9 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 30.1 Splatting 31.2 27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
120gb S SD 120GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: P011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.3% Below average	Read 124 Write 109 Mixed 116 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 17 76% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 29.2 DQ Write 60.3 DQ Mixed 20.2 22% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 48%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60 7,916 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 225GB free Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 57.2 Write 53.6 Mixed 61.4 43% 57.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.3 68% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 87GB free Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 68.5 Write 79.6 Mixed 63.5 53% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.43 86% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.8% Poor	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 10.4 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 7.1 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4N68T-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	3x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	3x
Athlon II X4 630AMDBench 45%, 7,197 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	3x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	3x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
SS DSA2BW120G3 120GBIntelBench 34%, 12 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	7x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	6x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16