Asus B85-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131029
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateAug 18 '23 at 22:00
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 187
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 314
44% 327 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 2005 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 54
Reflection 55.3
Parallax 47.7
44% 52.3 fps
MRender 40.4
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 45.7
37% 45 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 527ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 115 119 113 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 380
Write 132
Mixed 189
SusWrite 116
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 33.1
123% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 129
100% 137 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 73%
Seagate ST500VT000-1DK142 500GB
57GB free
Firmware: 0001SDC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 98 101 100 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 201
Write 23.7
Mixed 63
SusWrite 98.1
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 48 60 24.1" 1280 720 SAM043F SyncMaster
Typical B85-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback