Asrock AB350M Pro4 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory30.7 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateAug 18 '23 at 16:00
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 610
61% 496 Pts
64-Core 737
46% 737 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
Sapphire(1DA2 E439) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 165
Parallax 370
140% 235 fps
MRender 299
Gravity 182
Splatting 241
196% 240 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 147%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB
462GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1770
Write 1,722
Mixed 1,819
396% 1,770 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 61.7
194% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 902
DQ Write 624
DQ Mixed 794
585% 774 MB/s
Poor: 177% Great: 492%
WD WD60PURX-64LZMY0 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 172
Write 176
Mixed 85.4
107% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 100%
WD WD60PURX-64LZMY0 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 150
Write 89.5
Mixed 15.5
61% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC48
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 116
Mixed 56.1
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 1
275% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
682GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 138
Write 142
Mixed 97.1
94% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 99%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 94.5
Write 132
Mixed 91
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
288% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 97%
SanDisk 3.2 Gen1 125GB
9GB free, PID 55b1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.4
Write 24.7
Mixed 7.7
25% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 61%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB
83GB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.1
Write 39.3
Mixed 30
45% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
82% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 40GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.3% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 19.3
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 84.6" 1280 720 HEC002F HISENSE
Typical AB350M Pro4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback