Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '23 at 22:43
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$328
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 98.4
1-Core 162
2-Core 315
105% 192 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 958
96% 781 Pts
64-Core 1,381
86% 1,381 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 106%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56% Above average
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 73.1
Parallax 67.6
56% 70 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 66.9
55% 67.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Hellfire NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$233
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 165 175 174 167 189 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 1,010
Write 164
Mixed 253
SusWrite 178
87% 401 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 39.5
161% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 188
221% 401 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 123%
Great: 195%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
102GB free
Firmware: 507KC4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 154 154 153 155 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 380
Write 213
Mixed 246
SusWrite 157
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 44.7
165% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 134
123% 188 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 73%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
544GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 467 467 470 468 469 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 473
Mixed 405
SusWrite 468
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 54.1
182% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 291
240% 344 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 122%
Great: 125%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
37GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 88 86 76 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 83.5
Write 73.6
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 84
57% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 54.8
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 43.2
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 33.3
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 40.9
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 44
91% 44 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 114%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 2R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 36% 33 219 60 60 27" 2560 1440 DELD0FC DELL P2720DC
Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback