Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 R5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics90.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 R5  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display7851 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150401
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateAug 17 '23 at 06:23
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 111
50% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 298
30% 241 Pts
64-Core 300
18% 300 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.7% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 108
Parallax 117
97% 115 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 87.6
Splatting 85.3
79% 98.7 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 438
Write 347
Mixed 320
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 34.7
113% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 240
182% 246 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 148
Write 143
Mixed 98.1
97% 130 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.2
673% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.2
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 1R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 15% 27 204 58 165 72" 7851 1440 MNTABCF NV Surround
Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 R5 Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $423
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback