Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory250.3 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '23 at 22:56
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 164
56% 101 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 636
57% 482 Pts
64-Core 3303
204% 3303 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 180
Parallax 172
138% 174 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 175
Splatting 120
114% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
740GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1472 1424 1379 1313 1325 1320 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,156
Write 1,363
Mixed 1,608
SusWrite 1,372
364% 1,625 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 59
191% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 608
DQ Write 538
DQ Mixed 564
426% 570 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 255%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7AFR4N-UH 8x31.9GB
8 of 16 slots used
255GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 47.7
MC Mixed 69
160% 55.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 14
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 134%
Great: 167%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0E84 SAMSUNG
Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback