Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140628
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateAug 16 '23 at 10:48
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 203
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 348
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 6.7
3% 4.4 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 3%
AMD RX 6600-XT-$300
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 136
Parallax 224
92% 158 fps
MRender 214
Gravity 117
Splatting 178
139% 170 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 462
Write 398
Mixed 274
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 36.6
132% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 89.4
DQ Mixed 118
102% 155 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
75GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 284 292 298 298 291 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 416
Mixed 364
SusWrite 297
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 47.9
157% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 354
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
484GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 96 96 97 100 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 149
Write 146
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 97.9
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.9% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 10
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 23" 1920 1027 PHLC0C7 PHL 234E5
Typical GA-H97M-D3H Builds (Compare 2,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback