Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '23 at 08:11
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 165
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 307
40% 302 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3004) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.7% Below average
Lighting 47.2
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 52.8
38% 41.8 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 43.3
Splatting 21.5
25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 118 119 119 113 116 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.6% Above average
Read 233
Write 155
Mixed 185
SusWrite 118
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 28.4
93% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 129
110% 161 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 116%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
27GB free
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 22 23 24 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 73%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 110 113 113 112 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 112
Write 113
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 113
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-181.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 21.5" 1280 720 MST08D5 AVTEX TV
Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $391
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback