Positivo C14CR21TV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemPositivo C14CR21TV  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo C14CR21TV
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime70.9 Days
Run DateAug 15 '23 at 20:13
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2020M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 51.7
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 112
40% 69.4 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 117
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(1297 2027) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 512GB
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1102A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 360 296 299 335 312 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
63% Good
Read 360
Write 350
Mixed 347
SusWrite 324
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 15
76% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 93.1
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 31
55% 105 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63%
Great: 187%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 28 19 60 14" 1366 768 LGD0385
Typical C14CR21TV Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo C14CR21TV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Terrible Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback