Dynabook PORTEGE X30W-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDynabook PORTEGE X30W-K  (all builds)
MotherboardDynabook OK0118/0000
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230217
Uptime28.9 Days
Run DateAug 15 '23 at 19:14
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 48.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 263
74% 145 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 797
80% 650 Pts
64-Core 864
54% 864 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(3100 0004) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 27.9
18% 25.4 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 21.4
21% 25.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00B00 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7501Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 541 626 622 724 835 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 786
Write 734
Mixed 572
SusWrite 582
150% 668 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 22
84% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 550
DQ Write 63
DQ Mixed 123
136% 245 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 106%
Great: 224%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
118% Outstanding
MC Read 45.7
MC Write 51.6
MC Mixed 45.8
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 20.8
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 109%
This bench: 118%
Great: 158%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 46 60 13.3" 1296 759 SHP1567
Typical PORTEGE X30W-K Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Dynabook PORTEGE X30W-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback