Asrock Z97 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory14.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '23 at 19:08
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 232
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 605
64% 509 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.24% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.7
3% 4.27 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.24%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 366 429 427 448 448 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 466
Mixed 369
SusWrite 423
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 42.8
148% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 153 153 153 153 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 155
Write 128
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 151
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
1TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 123 120 120 122 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 131
Write 100
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 120
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
53GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 103 95 93 120 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 171
Write 151
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 112
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 113%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 64GB
58GB free, PID cb25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 0 6.4 8 4.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 101
Write 9.2
Mixed 12
SusWrite 4.5
27% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
58% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-107.A00LF 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 9905403-107.A00LF 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical Z97 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme6 - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $844
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback