Daten LUNAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDaten LUNAR  (all builds)
MotherboardDaten GM5AGEO
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220621
Uptime3 Days
Run DateAug 15 '23 at 17:33
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 73.7
1-Core 188
2-Core 351
107% 204 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 931
98% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,327
82% 1,327 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Device(1D05 1178) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3699
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.1% Above average
Lighting 77.3
Reflection 76.3
Parallax 67
63% 73.5 fps
MRender 72.6
Gravity 58.6
Splatting 59.8
52% 63.7 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SM2P32A8-512GC1 512GB
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1326 1463 1521 930 265 257 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1314
Write 1,283
Mixed 1,329
SusWrite 960
275% 1,221 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 64.5
229% 86.3 MB/s
DQ Read 738
DQ Write 1,019
DQ Mixed 894
671% 884 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 221%
Great: 291%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Daten Tecnologia LTDA DATEN 8G4N32 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 36.4
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 26.1
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 13% 23 211 48 144 15.5" 1536 864 BOE090F
Typical LUNAR Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

System: Daten LUNAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback