Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive301% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING II  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '23 at 12:14
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$304
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 86.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 230
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 894
78% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,400
87% 1,400 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1391 1331 1278 1271 1268 1029 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 2,568
Write 2,391
Mixed 1,870
SusWrite 1,261
453% 2,022 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 82.7
270% 93.6 MB/s
DQ Read 850
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 835
624% 828 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 301%
Great: 410%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
550GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 481 463 471 464 467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 468
Mixed 456
SusWrite 471
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 57.3
180% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 122%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4W.M8FE1 BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 BL8G36C16U4W.M8FE1 BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 40.3
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 37.2
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 0" 1920 1080
Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING II Builds (Compare 5,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback