MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 23:41
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,007
95% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,440
89% 1,440 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Gigabyte(1458 3795) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.1% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 129
Parallax 119
94% 121 fps
MRender 91.7
Gravity 122
Splatting 108
88% 107 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct250mx5 0 250GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 262 266 266 263 246 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 504
Write 267
Mixed 292
SusWrite 257
73% 330 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 38.8
138% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 160
132% 190 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 121%
ST8000NE0021-2EN112 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 230 230 234 230 231 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 230
Write 174
Mixed 102
SusWrite 227
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 1
8% 3.7 MB/s
DQ Read 2.1
DQ Write 14.4
DQ Mixed 2.1
3% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 26%
Ct480bx5 0 480GB
395GB free
Firmware: M6C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 432 436 437 435 237 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 446
Mixed 400
SusWrite 392
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 26.1
139% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 34.3
66% 131 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 83%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
302GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 443 447 447 446 446 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 443
Mixed 426
SusWrite 434
99% 437 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 56
185% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 152
129% 189 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 111%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4W.M16FE1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.8
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 38.5
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 100 34" 3440 1440 SAM0F1D C34J79x
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $999
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback