MSI P43 Neo-F (MS-7519)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7519
MotherboardMSI P43 Neo-F (MS-7519)  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100118
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 18 '17 at 23:27
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5450-$195
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 102
47% 74.7 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 205
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Lighting 49.4
Reflection 45.2
Parallax 41
40% 45.2 fps
MRender 39.8
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 38
33% 40 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
746GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 165
Mixed 97.4
103% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.35
97% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 109%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
0GB free
Firmware: 1AG01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.94% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 16.6
Mixed 17.1
13% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.77
4K Mixed 0.17
52% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 9.94%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 94
43% 94 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P43 Neo-F (MS-7519) Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI P43 Neo-F (MS-7519)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback