Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics180% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 19:19
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 192
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 427
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
XFX(1EAE 6950) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
180% Outstanding
Lighting 203
Reflection 242
Parallax 510
165% 318 fps
MRender 409
Gravity 221
Splatting 345
266% 325 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 180%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 135 27 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 464
Write 298
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 95.6
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 13.1
88% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 73.6
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 15.4
50% 103 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 99%
OCZ Agility 4 256GB-$35
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 175 180 183 189 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.5% Good
Read 222
Write 186
Mixed 164
SusWrite 180
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 26.6
103% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 202
157% 217 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 87%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
379GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 104 102 106 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 93.9
Write 58.7
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 104
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3733 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 11.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 28.8" 2560 1080 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical Z270 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 1,076 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback