Acer Aspire M5811

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire M5811  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer H57M01
Memory1.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091231
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 17:43
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Memory 44.7
1-Core 53
2-Core 94.7
38% 64.1 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 143
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320
Sapphire(174B 2150) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.3
3% 2.73 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 2.3
3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 43 41 38 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 69.1
Write 62.1
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 43.1
41% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 75.A73C1.G02 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
23.7% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 1R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 8% 49 37 24 60 19.4" 1600 900 AOC2070 2070W
Typical Aspire M5811 Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5811

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $151
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback