Positivo VJFE52F11X-B1811H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemPositivo VJFE52F11X-B1811H  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJFE-CL
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime36.7 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 15:54
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 102
46% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 238
26% 208 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 3.1
2% 2.9 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CL4-8D256 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EV80902 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 788 442 438 328 286 272 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 1,473
Write 1,069
Mixed 942
SusWrite 426
218% 977 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 20.7
96% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 493
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 456
319% 406 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 130%
Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown P48808GSHCRN-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE07CB
Typical VJFE52F11X-B1811H Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJFE52F11X-B1811H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback